ForeFlight Voyager is primarily focused on providing live air traffic information and realistic airport models, making it unsuitable for user access management. In contrast, Keycloak is specifically designed for identity and access management, supporting single sign-on and various identity providers. Therefore, if your goal is to manage user access, Keycloak is the better choice.

While ForeFlight Voyager and Keycloak serve different purposes, they can be used together in a broader application context. For instance, if you are developing an aviation-related application that requires user authentication and access management, you could use Keycloak to handle user identities and ForeFlight Voyager to provide air traffic data. However, they do not directly compete with each other.

ForeFlight Voyager is an app that allows users to watch live air traffic take off and depart from realistic 3D models of real airports. It also lets users listen to real air comms traffic from supported airports.

ForeFlight Voyager offers features such as watching live air traffic with realistic 3D models of airports and listening to real air comms traffic from supported airports.

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.

Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.

Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.

Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.