ChromeWinner vs. Google's Rich Search Results Test
ChromeWinner
🏅 ChromeWinner is "ahrefs for extensions". Analyze the competition, learn from the best and promote your extension. Receive daily updates on how your extensions perform and what competitors do. Grow your user base organically in Chrome Web Store by learning from already successful extensions. Subscribe to daily email digest and receive detailed updates: 📈 SERP for Chrome Store: monitor search results in the Chrome Web Store 👤 daily user growth: know which extensions acquire users faster ⚠️ get alerts when there are new players in the market (new competitors) ✍️ new reviews and rating changes - use competitors' feedback for your own profit ✨ get notified when competitors release new versions
Google's Rich Search Results Test
Got your structured data and JSON-LD in place? Great, now go test it. Google has a free tool to help you view your search results as they see it - and spot potential errors or areas for improvement.

Reviews
Reviews
Item | Votes | Upvote |
---|---|---|
No pros yet, would you like to add one? |
Item | Votes | Upvote |
---|---|---|
No cons yet, would you like to add one? |
Item | Votes | Upvote |
---|---|---|
No pros yet, would you like to add one? |
Item | Votes | Upvote |
---|---|---|
No cons yet, would you like to add one? |
Frequently Asked Questions
ChromeWinner focuses on analyzing competition and providing insights on user growth and performance in the Chrome Web Store, making it a powerful tool for promoting extensions. In contrast, Google's Rich Search Results Test is designed to help developers ensure their structured data is correctly implemented, which can enhance search visibility but does not provide competitive analysis. Therefore, if your goal is to improve visibility through competitive insights, ChromeWinner may be more effective, while Google's tool is essential for ensuring proper structured data implementation.
Yes, Google's Rich Search Results Test can complement ChromeWinner's features. While ChromeWinner provides insights into user growth and competitor performance in the Chrome Web Store, Google's tool ensures that your structured data is correctly set up, which can improve how your extension appears in search results. Using both tools together can enhance your overall strategy for visibility and user acquisition.
ChromeWinner is a tool designed for analyzing Chrome extensions, similar to how Ahrefs is used for website analysis. It helps users analyze the competition, learn from successful extensions, and promote their own extensions. It provides daily updates on extension performance, monitors search results in the Chrome Web Store, tracks daily user growth, alerts users about new market competitors, and notifies about reviews, rating changes, and new version releases.
ChromeWinner offers several features, including monitoring SERP for the Chrome Web Store, tracking daily user growth, providing alerts for new competitors, updating on new reviews and rating changes, and notifying users about new version releases of competitor extensions. These features are designed to help grow a user base organically in the Chrome Web Store by learning from successful extensions.
Google's Rich Search Results Test is a free tool provided by Google that allows you to test your structured data and JSON-LD. It helps you view your search results as Google sees them and spot potential errors or areas for improvement.
To use Google's Rich Search Results Test, you simply need to visit the tool's website, enter the URL of the page you want to test, and run the test. The tool will display the search results as Google sees them and highlight any errors or areas that need improvement.
The benefits of using Google's Rich Search Results Test include the ability to identify and fix errors in your structured data, ensure your search results appear correctly, and optimize your content for better visibility in search engine results pages.
One limitation of Google's Rich Search Results Test is that it only shows how your search results appear to Google and may not reflect how they appear on other search engines. Additionally, it may not catch all potential errors or issues with your structured data.